I’m not too sure where to begin in describing The Tree of
Life. It’s undeniably an unorthodox film that puts all of its money on
crafting impressionistic scenes over a plot driven narrative. It may feature
two of film’s most mainstream stars (Penn and Pitt) but by no means is it a
mainstream film. It sits comfortably in a world of its own, hoping an open
minded filmgoer will come along and give it a chance. With a film like The Tree
of Life and the visionary puzzle it develops into, all you can hope is that
someone can give it a chance before they label it as senseless and pretentious.
Actually, I wouldn’t be too disappointed if someone labeled it pretentious
because in many ways it is. But then again, what film isn’t seen as pretentious
when it boldly attempts to capture the essence and questions of life within the
time frame of two or so hours? It’s equivalent to trying to stuff a whale
into a sardine can, and Malick makes one hell of an effort. Notorious for being
a mad scientist behind the camera and in the editing process, Malick once again
obliterates any chance of a conventional narrative by focusing The Tree of Life
on four, maybe five, periods of time.
Monday, July 25, 2011
Monday, July 11, 2011
"Dark of the Moon" is a step up, but that's not saying much (3/5)
I often get annoyed by film watchers who try and defend a
film they covet (and that critics hate) with the simple phrase of “Geez, it’s a
movie about an over-the-top fictional subject. It wasn’t meant for the Oscars!”
With how much hate Transformers: Dark of the Moon is getting, expect to hear
that phrase quite a bit for the next few months. Let me start off with saying
that Michael Bay is a director who has a keen eye for filling a frame with
visual panache. It’s just that Bay gets distracted by a shiny object off in the
distance to the point that he loses focus on the story and characters that
emanate from within. Naturally, I expect
those who love this film to offer me a rebuttal along the lines of, “It’s not
about some amazing story! It’s about the robot on robot action!” No, everything
is undeniably about the story. The action means absolutely nothing unless a
story is present and logical within the film’s framework. Hell, if story wasn’t significant, Bay and
his team wouldn’t have even bothered with trying to craft one. Instead they
would’ve released an hour long action fest to satiate those who like to watch
big, combustible objects go up in flames.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)